Exynos 2200 launch teased as Galaxy S22 confusion continues
0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 7 Second

If there is one word that can be used to describe the Galaxy S22 as we know through rumors, it will be “confusing.” Although most rumors seem to agree to some of the main aspects of three cellphones, they have so far turned out to be a bag of mixed disappointed and expectations. More confusing, however, is the situation with the Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung The Snapdragon 898. At least one part of uncertainty may eventually rest when Samsung announces the silicone focus of graphics next week.

Exynos 2200: AMD RDNA

The future of the brand and product line Exynos is slightly cloudy in recent years, mainly because the performance gap between the equivalent Snapdragon processor continues to widen. When almost all expectations are gone, Samsung and AMD make the pact that will bring the last IP graphics to the arm-on-chip (SOC) arm-based, more traditional technology is associated with desktops and laptop charts. It returned in 2019, and would take more than two years for anything to really come out from him.

The Samsung Exynos’instagram account makes a post that can be taken as a teaser for what is believed to be called Exynos 2200. It talks about what will look like in the future after gaming graphics evolved from a distant simple arcade game. past. But there is also a rather unpleasant part about moving to a new home on November 19, signaling several major organizational changes.

Of course, the post doesn’t touch anything about the exynos 2200 itself, besides the focus on the chart. The previous leak has placed the standard tri-cluster core configuration of one cortex-x2, three cortex-a710 corses, and four Cores Cortex-A510, several clocks at higher speeds than the new snapdragon 898 leaked. However, the initial benchmark score. Everywhere and still behind Silicon Apple.

There is a leak and even the teaser from Samsung that alludes to Exynos providing a severe emphasis on Ray Tracing, one of the biggest trends in today’s graphics technology. This will definitely be a big boost for cellular graphics, but the utility outside the game might be rather limited. The performance of the Exynos 2200 CPU will remain more critical, and the jury is still out whether it will be better than the upcoming Qualcomm standard carrier.

Galaxy S22: The Great Divide

Exynos 2200 graphics will be in vain if it doesn’t end on the device they can actually get. That’s where confusion lies when it comes to the Galaxy S22 series because there is disagreement whether Samsung chips will even be present in the next seed.

Of course, it cannot be imagined that Samsung will not use the exynos chip itself on the Galaxy S22, especially in South Korea, where he has gotten a lot of flak to do it last year with the Galaxy S21. It seems, instead, Samsung will aim for the launch of the very limited model of the Galaxy S22 Exynos-Toting, especially in South Korea and Europe.

This problem with Split is that not all Samsung fans are the exynos chip fans. Those in Europe, in particular, feels the shortcomings to always be given the Exynos model only, especially during the period when Exynos lags far behind Snapdragon in performance. On the other hand, if Exynos 2200 ends outside this world, other markets will definitely feel left in turn.

Of course, that all depends on how the exynos 2200 that many hyped will change, and not only in graphics performance. There are only so many ways that more sophisticated graphics can be used on cellular devices, and except Samsung and AMD have found a way to use it for processing of general purposes, Qualcomm may still have excellence in overall performance.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
OWC Accelsior 8M2 PCIe SSD is insanely fast and expensive Previous post OWC Accelsior 8M2 PCIe SSD is insanely fast and expensive
Qualcomm Snapdragon Spaces XR platform gets some help from T-Mobile Next post Qualcomm Snapdragon Spaces XR platform gets some help from T-Mobile

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *